Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > 2.3L Mustang > 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Reload this Page Turbo!!!
Notices
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

This THREAD brought to you by...
(#1 (permalink))
Old
fivepointoh5585's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 120
Join Date: March 2002
Turbo!!! - 10-07-02, 08:18 PM

Hey guys ....I know this question has been asked alot but i have a little different idea this time.......I was thinking about buying a low mileage 2.3 n/a motor and putting it on an engine stand and working on it and clean it up real nice (polishing,porting,powdercoating) and then bolting up an turbo header (e6??) and then a t-3 or t-4 hybrid and big vane meter and turbo computer.....what else would i need besides these things.....i think some forged pistons....but can i still use the n/a block ...would it hold up to the turbo? Any suggestions would be nice....


P.S. I have thought about just getting an turbomotor ,but wasnt real sure if it would be good quality ...cause most i find are high mileage....so thought building one would be betterin the long run.....!!!


Thanks,
Daniel




1994 Mustang GT Black on Black
5-speed with 302 5.0L
Bought for $750
Total spent on the car (including the price of the car) $1654
Reply With Quote
(#2 (permalink))
Old
gibson89LX's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 1,955
Join Date: January 2002
Location: Brunswick, OH
Re: Turbo!!! - 10-07-02, 08:29 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by fivepointoh5585
Hey guys ....I know this question has been asked alot but i have a little different idea this time.......I was thinking about buying a low mileage 2.3 n/a motor and putting it on an engine stand and working on it and clean it up real nice (polishing,porting,powdercoating) and then bolting up an turbo header (e6??) and then a t-3 or t-4 hybrid and big vane meter and turbo computer.....what else would i need besides these things.....i think some forged pistons....but can i still use the n/a block ...would it hold up to the turbo? Any suggestions would be nice....


P.S. I have thought about just getting an turbomotor ,but wasnt real sure if it would be good quality ...cause most i find are high mileage....so thought building one would be betterin the long run.....!!!


Thanks,
Daniel
You'd want to open the combustion chamber a little bit because if you ran the na head, the compression would be too high.




'02 zinc yellow GT
254.0rwhp/304.7rwtq
_-=Suspension=-_
Steeda Springs
Kenny Brown STB
Kenny Brown CC Plates
Full-Length Subframe Connectors
KYB AGX Shocks
_-=Power=-_
Magnaflow Cat-back
BBK Mid
SC Tune
Accufab plenum/70mm TB
Steeda Underdrives
BBK CAI
FMS Alum DS
4.10s

=RIP=TURBOCHARGED '89 black 2.3L Mustang
.63 Garret T3 Gillis Valve
3" exhaust to 2.25" dual dynomax
Big VAM/k&n conical
e6 exhaust manifold
Brown top 35lb injectors
8UA computer
Bigger Swaybars
130a alternator
Reply With Quote
(#3 (permalink))
Old
bhuff30's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 4,665
Join Date: December 2001
Location: Lawrence KS
10-07-02, 08:40 PM

Sounds like a plan. I am trying to do something like that, but without all the bells and whistles. It is nickle and diming me to death.
The NA block is idential except for the pistons and oil tap. You should go to forged dish pistons.
Don't forget about oil return, oil sending, water return and sending, intake piping, and everything.
The parts seem to add up real quick, between an E6 header, turbo, injectors, computer, vam, intercooler, and anything else you might want. Certainly a good plan.


Reply With Quote
(#4 (permalink))
Old
Stinger's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 7,720
Join Date: July 2001
Location: Wilson, KS
10-07-02, 10:42 PM

Why not do the same thing to a turbo motor? If you are gonna do all the cleaning up and everything then I'm sure you are saying a rebuild is part of the plan...blocks don't go "bad" for the most part so it doesn't matter if it's high mileage or not...it will be fine. Or you can do it your way and cost yourself twice as much

Stinger


Reply With Quote
(#5 (permalink))
Old
fivepointoh5585's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 120
Join Date: March 2002
10-08-02, 07:13 PM

thanks alot for all the help guys!..




Thanks,
Daniel




1994 Mustang GT Black on Black
5-speed with 302 5.0L
Bought for $750
Total spent on the car (including the price of the car) $1654
Reply With Quote
(#6 (permalink))
Old
BlkStang2.3L's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 447
Join Date: August 2001
Location: Washington, IN
10-08-02, 09:18 PM

I agree 100% with Stinger. Rebuild and fix up a turbo motor rather than doing it to an NA.


Reply With Quote
(#7 (permalink))
Old
kiddiccarus's Avatar  
Posts: 1,298
Join Date: December 2003
Location: RCA DOME/Aisle 328/Row 3/ Seats 4 and 5 or Bardstown, Ky
Turbo block - 01-07-04, 11:15 PM

go and look into a junk yard and see what you will find in a turbo block I agree with the other that the rebuild will negate the mileage on the block.



Last edited by kiddiccarus; 01-07-04 at 11:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
(#8 (permalink))
Old
kiddiccarus's Avatar  
Posts: 1,298
Join Date: December 2003
Location: RCA DOME/Aisle 328/Row 3/ Seats 4 and 5 or Bardstown, Ky
buy a turbo block and keep the n/a one - 01-07-04, 11:17 PM

here is the plan with a back up, find a turbo block, rebuild it and fit it to all that your dreams will allow then swap them out and then you can play with the n/a block polish it port it play all that you like because who knows what can happen when you may need to have a spare engine. that is the plan of action that I am heading into now. when you rebuild the block it will be like new anyways so you might as well go with the turbo high mileage block


Reply With Quote
(#9 (permalink))
Old
gibson89LX's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 1,955
Join Date: January 2002
Location: Brunswick, OH
01-07-04, 11:21 PM

damn, back from the DEAD!




'02 zinc yellow GT
254.0rwhp/304.7rwtq
_-=Suspension=-_
Steeda Springs
Kenny Brown STB
Kenny Brown CC Plates
Full-Length Subframe Connectors
KYB AGX Shocks
_-=Power=-_
Magnaflow Cat-back
BBK Mid
SC Tune
Accufab plenum/70mm TB
Steeda Underdrives
BBK CAI
FMS Alum DS
4.10s

=RIP=TURBOCHARGED '89 black 2.3L Mustang
.63 Garret T3 Gillis Valve
3" exhaust to 2.25" dual dynomax
Big VAM/k&n conical
e6 exhaust manifold
Brown top 35lb injectors
8UA computer
Bigger Swaybars
130a alternator
Reply With Quote
(#10 (permalink))
Old
Dr_EluSivE's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 2,198
Join Date: April 2002
Location: Central Illinois
01-07-04, 11:48 PM

a recent thread on TF covered this and some of the all knowing members have looked into the differences and have seen stong evidence stating that the turbo blocks were cast with a harder mix of steel. JDB was also explaining that he had no problems with turbo blocks but have split N/A blocks. I would find a turbo block if possible. I always thought they were the same too but this recent thread on turboford suggests otherwise.

Dr.




1973 Mg Midget.
....Mods....
1275cc, 4 spd, 4.22 gears Weber DGV Carb. "minilite" wheels.

1992 Mustang LX Hatchback 2.3 Turbo
....Mods....
88' TC turbo swap, E6, Roller cam, 8ua, and .63 T3, Intercooled, Converted Auto to Manual. 3.73 gears, Tri-Ax, UPR Clutch Quad, firewall adjuster, FMS DS, Steeda SFC's, "GT" Steering Rack, 1 1/8" Front Swaybar, 11/16" Rear, Poly Bushings, Custom exhaust (2.5") Flowmaster Delta flow. No Cats.

Reply With Quote
(#11 (permalink))
Old
kiddiccarus's Avatar  
Posts: 1,298
Join Date: December 2003
Location: RCA DOME/Aisle 328/Row 3/ Seats 4 and 5 or Bardstown, Ky
01-08-04, 01:42 AM

The difference in the block is right, but as others have proven that the n/a block is sufficient for the job. but you willhave to know what you are doing and you have to keep an eye on it. in the long run the turbo block is best as always but if you are not going for the max power and trying to reach 300hp+ then you will be alright with the n/a block.


Reply With Quote
(#12 (permalink))
Old
jman_b13's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 2,267
Join Date: July 2000
Location: Edmond/Norman OK
01-08-04, 01:49 AM

the spliting only happens on the newer blocks, because they have very thin walls on some of the cylinders. if your using anything older than 88 you shouldn't have any problem.




Michael Bowen
StangRides
93 Silver Metallic LX Convertible
86 Mustang SVO 9L, Leather, Sunroof -- Stock++
85 Merkur XR4Ti, Black, 5 Speed, No Sunroof
Reply With Quote
(#13 (permalink))
Old
Official Member
 
Posts: 968
Join Date: December 2003
Location: West Texas
01-09-04, 10:45 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinger
Why not do the same thing to a turbo motor? If you are gonna do all the cleaning up and everything then I'm sure you are saying a rebuild is part of the plan...blocks don't go "bad" for the most part so it doesn't matter if it's high mileage or not...it will be fine. Or you can do it your way and cost yourself twice as much

Stinger
Sorry but I normaly go for the under dog, but this time I would have to agree with stinger. I was going to use my N/A motor etc, but once I added everything up it came out cheaper and easier to buy a old complete 88'TC and use everything off it. Someone also told me the forged dished pistons that you would need are getting hard to come by especially if the block needs to be bored and over sized psitons is needed.

P.S I'm using everything off the TC from the rear end to the T-5 etc you could proubly do it cheaper than me if you just do a turbo swap. Now if you do use a N/A don't use a twin plug head it cost more to use it.


Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump