| Notices |
StangNet.com is 10 years old!
Come on! Help us celebrate this fantastic feat by stopping in and letting us know how StangNet has shaped your experience surrounding the Ford Mustang! |
|
This THREAD brought to you by... |
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 120
Join Date: March 2002
|
|
|
Turbo!!! -
10-07-02, 08:18 PM
Hey guys ....I know this question has been asked alot but i have a little different idea this time.......I was thinking about buying a low mileage 2.3 n/a motor and putting it on an engine stand and working on it and clean it up real nice (polishing,porting,powdercoating) and then bolting up an turbo header (e6??) and then a t-3 or t-4 hybrid and big vane meter and turbo computer.....what else would i need besides these things.....i think some forged pistons....but can i still use the n/a block ...would it hold up to the turbo? Any suggestions would be nice....
P.S. I have thought about just getting an turbomotor ,but wasnt real sure if it would be good quality ...cause most i find are high mileage....so thought building one would be betterin the long run.....!!!
Thanks,
Daniel
1994 Mustang GT Black on Black
5-speed with 302 5.0L
Bought for $750
Total spent on the car (including the price of the car) $1654
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 1,955
Join Date: January 2002
Location: Brunswick, OH
|
|
|
Re: Turbo!!! -
10-07-02, 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by fivepointoh5585
Hey guys ....I know this question has been asked alot but i have a little different idea this time.......I was thinking about buying a low mileage 2.3 n/a motor and putting it on an engine stand and working on it and clean it up real nice (polishing,porting,powdercoating) and then bolting up an turbo header (e6??) and then a t-3 or t-4 hybrid and big vane meter and turbo computer.....what else would i need besides these things.....i think some forged pistons....but can i still use the n/a block ...would it hold up to the turbo? Any suggestions would be nice....
P.S. I have thought about just getting an turbomotor ,but wasnt real sure if it would be good quality ...cause most i find are high mileage....so thought building one would be betterin the long run.....!!!
Thanks,
Daniel
|
You'd want to open the combustion chamber a little bit because if you ran the na head, the compression would be too high.
'02 zinc yellow GT
254.0rwhp/304.7rwtq
_-=Suspension=-_
Steeda Springs
Kenny Brown STB
Kenny Brown CC Plates
Full-Length Subframe Connectors
KYB AGX Shocks
_-=Power=-_
Magnaflow Cat-back
BBK Mid
SC Tune
Accufab plenum/70mm TB
Steeda Underdrives
BBK CAI
FMS Alum DS
4.10s
=RIP=TURBOCHARGED '89 black 2.3L Mustang
.63 Garret T3 Gillis Valve
3" exhaust to 2.25" dual dynomax
Big VAM/k&n conical
e6 exhaust manifold
Brown top 35lb injectors
8UA computer
Bigger Swaybars
130a alternator
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 4,665
Join Date: December 2001
Location: Lawrence KS
|
|
|
10-07-02, 08:40 PM
Sounds like a plan. I am trying to do something like that, but without all the bells and whistles. It is nickle and diming me to death.
The NA block is idential except for the pistons and oil tap. You should go to forged dish pistons.
Don't forget about oil return, oil sending, water return and sending, intake piping, and everything.
The parts seem to add up real quick, between an E6 header, turbo, injectors, computer, vam, intercooler, and anything else you might want. Certainly a good plan.
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 7,720
Join Date: July 2001
Location: Wilson, KS
|
|
|
10-07-02, 10:42 PM
Why not do the same thing to a turbo motor? If you are gonna do all the cleaning up and everything then I'm sure you are saying a rebuild is part of the plan...blocks don't go "bad" for the most part so it doesn't matter if it's high mileage or not...it will be fine. Or you can do it your way and cost yourself twice as much
Stinger
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 120
Join Date: March 2002
|
|
|
10-08-02, 07:13 PM
thanks alot for all the help guys!..
Thanks,
Daniel
1994 Mustang GT Black on Black
5-speed with 302 5.0L
Bought for $750
Total spent on the car (including the price of the car) $1654
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 447
Join Date: August 2001
Location: Washington, IN
|
|
|
10-08-02, 09:18 PM
I agree 100% with Stinger. Rebuild and fix up a turbo motor rather than doing it to an NA.
|
 |
|
|
Posts: 1,298
Join Date: December 2003
Location: RCA DOME/Aisle 328/Row 3/ Seats 4 and 5 or Bardstown, Ky
|
|
|
Turbo block -
01-07-04, 11:15 PM
go and look into a junk yard and see what you will find in a turbo block I agree with the other that the rebuild will negate the mileage on the block.
Last edited by kiddiccarus; 01-07-04 at 11:20 PM.
|
 |
|
|
Posts: 1,298
Join Date: December 2003
Location: RCA DOME/Aisle 328/Row 3/ Seats 4 and 5 or Bardstown, Ky
|
|
|
buy a turbo block and keep the n/a one -
01-07-04, 11:17 PM
here is the plan with a back up, find a turbo block, rebuild it and fit it to all that your dreams will allow then swap them out and then you can play with the n/a block polish it port it play all that you like because who knows what can happen when you may need to have a spare engine. that is the plan of action that I am heading into now. when you rebuild the block it will be like new anyways so you might as well go with the turbo high mileage block
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 1,955
Join Date: January 2002
Location: Brunswick, OH
|
|
|
01-07-04, 11:21 PM
damn, back from the DEAD!
'02 zinc yellow GT
254.0rwhp/304.7rwtq
_-=Suspension=-_
Steeda Springs
Kenny Brown STB
Kenny Brown CC Plates
Full-Length Subframe Connectors
KYB AGX Shocks
_-=Power=-_
Magnaflow Cat-back
BBK Mid
SC Tune
Accufab plenum/70mm TB
Steeda Underdrives
BBK CAI
FMS Alum DS
4.10s
=RIP=TURBOCHARGED '89 black 2.3L Mustang
.63 Garret T3 Gillis Valve
3" exhaust to 2.25" dual dynomax
Big VAM/k&n conical
e6 exhaust manifold
Brown top 35lb injectors
8UA computer
Bigger Swaybars
130a alternator
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 2,198
Join Date: April 2002
Location: Central Illinois
|
|
|
01-07-04, 11:48 PM
a recent thread on TF covered this and some of the all knowing members have looked into the differences and have seen stong evidence stating that the turbo blocks were cast with a harder mix of steel. JDB was also explaining that he had no problems with turbo blocks but have split N/A blocks. I would find a turbo block if possible. I always thought they were the same too but this recent thread on turboford suggests otherwise.
Dr.
1973 Mg Midget.
....Mods....
1275cc, 4 spd, 4.22 gears Weber DGV Carb. "minilite" wheels.
1992 Mustang LX Hatchback 2.3 Turbo
....Mods....
88' TC turbo swap, E6, Roller cam, 8ua, and .63 T3, Intercooled, Converted Auto to Manual. 3.73 gears, Tri-Ax, UPR Clutch Quad, firewall adjuster, FMS DS, Steeda SFC's, "GT" Steering Rack, 1 1/8" Front Swaybar, 11/16" Rear, Poly Bushings, Custom exhaust (2.5") Flowmaster Delta flow. No Cats.
|
 |
|
|
Posts: 1,298
Join Date: December 2003
Location: RCA DOME/Aisle 328/Row 3/ Seats 4 and 5 or Bardstown, Ky
|
|
|
01-08-04, 01:42 AM
The difference in the block is right, but as others have proven that the n/a block is sufficient for the job. but you willhave to know what you are doing and you have to keep an eye on it. in the long run the turbo block is best as always but if you are not going for the max power and trying to reach 300hp+ then you will be alright with the n/a block.
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 2,267
Join Date: July 2000
Location: Edmond/Norman OK
|
|
|
01-08-04, 01:49 AM
the spliting only happens on the newer blocks, because they have very thin walls on some of the cylinders. if your using anything older than 88 you shouldn't have any problem.
Michael Bowen
StangRides
93 Silver Metallic LX Convertible
86 Mustang SVO 9L, Leather, Sunroof -- Stock++ 
85 Merkur XR4Ti, Black, 5 Speed, No Sunroof
|
|
Official Member
|
|
Posts: 968
Join Date: December 2003
Location: West Texas
|
|
|
01-09-04, 10:45 AM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stinger
Why not do the same thing to a turbo motor? If you are gonna do all the cleaning up and everything then I'm sure you are saying a rebuild is part of the plan...blocks don't go "bad" for the most part so it doesn't matter if it's high mileage or not...it will be fine. Or you can do it your way and cost yourself twice as much
Stinger
|
Sorry but I normaly go for the under dog, but this time I would have to agree with stinger. I was going to use my N/A motor etc, but once I added everything up it came out cheaper and easier to buy a old complete 88'TC and use everything off it. Someone also told me the forged dished pistons that you would need are getting hard to come by especially if the block needs to be bored and over sized psitons is needed.
P.S I'm using everything off the TC from the rear end to the T-5 etc you could proubly do it cheaper than me if you just do a turbo swap. Now if you do use a N/A don't use a twin plug head it cost more to use it.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|