Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > 2005+ (S-197) Mustang > 2005+ GT Tech
Reload this Page 2005 Headlight and Taillight Technology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes

This THREAD brought to you by...
(#1 (permalink))
Old
2005Eleanor's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 50
Join Date: November 2003
Location: Roswell, GA
2005 Headlight and Taillight Technology - 11-12-03, 07:22 PM

Any leads on the headlight and taillight technologies that are going to be used in the '05 stang. Any ideas? H.I.D.'s (if they can make the Nissan Altima come with them, why not the stang? Same price range). I've heard adaptive headlights. Does this mean they will come on automatically or does this mean that they will adapt to the road like BMW's 2004 lineup?

I know the taillights will be sequential, but what about LEDs? What about brake pressure sensitive taillights?...light up brighter, or more lights light up under hard braking.

Ideas, thoughts, leads anyone?


Reply With Quote
(#2 (permalink))
Old
MrClean302's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 226
Join Date: March 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
11-12-03, 07:24 PM

They offer HID in the SVT Focus so they better offer them on the Stangs. As for the pressure sensitive brakes, great idea, BMW uses this and every other car manufacturer should adapt this.




94 GT
Reply With Quote
(#3 (permalink))
Old
2005Eleanor's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 50
Join Date: November 2003
Location: Roswell, GA
11-12-03, 08:15 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrClean302
They offer HID in the SVT Focus so they better offer them on the Stangs. As for the pressure sensitive brakes, great idea, BMW uses this and every other car manufacturer should adapt this.
I had no clue that the SVT Focus had HIDs, looked on Ford's site, indeed they do! They better have HIDs on the new Stang if they put them on a $19k SVT Focus.

This brings up an interesting question. If Ford can use HID technology in a $19k car, Nissan makes HIDs standard in the Altima, and all of Acura's lineup (excluding RSX and MDX) come standard with HIDs, then why doesn't a $70k+ Mercedes S430 come standard with HIDs? Personally, even if they were an option, I'd be willing to pay an extra $500-$600 for them, they make a huge difference in visibility, especially in adverse weather conditions.

I think the decision to make the taillights sequential was a good one. It sets the car apart even more. I think sequential taillights would be even better if they were LEDs (then maybe we could have lime green, magenta, orlando magic blue, and syracuse orange taillights ). In all seriousness though, sequential, plus LED would make for a good looking, interesting taillight. Brake pressure sensitive taillights would be an added plus.

It will be interesting to see how things turn out.


Reply With Quote
(#4 (permalink))
Old
tylers65's Avatar
I've got your tool right here!
 
Posts: 3,681
Join Date: January 2001
Location: Tacoma, WA
11-12-03, 08:24 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2005Eleanor
...I know the taillights will be sequential, but what about LEDs? What about brake pressure sensitive taillights?...light up brighter, or more lights light up under hard braking.

Ideas, thoughts, leads anyone?
I know of a company that invented and patentded a pressure sensative tail light. unfortunately, the D.O.T. denied them citeing that most drivers would not know why the lights were getting brighter.

Personally, I think they are an excellent idea! I also can't see why the D.O.T. thinks that no one on the entire plannet has any common sense to be able to figure out that if the brake lights on the car ahead of them are getting brighter, then perhaps it is a sign that perhaps they might think of stopping


Reply With Quote
(#5 (permalink))
Old
SVTdriver's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 3,425
Join Date: September 2001
Location: Seattle Wa
11-12-03, 08:37 PM

Has any determination about the LED's in the stang taillights been made. I haven't heard so I'm still hopeful. Though I'm not sure how sensitive you could make an LED. I have only seen them with 2 levels of brightness.

As for the DOT. We all wonder what the heck many people are doing driving? There are many times I wonder if some people have common sense.


Reply With Quote
(#6 (permalink))
Old
2005Eleanor's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 50
Join Date: November 2003
Location: Roswell, GA
11-12-03, 08:43 PM

[quote=tylers65]I know of a company that invented and patentded a pressure sensative tail light. unfortunately, the D.O.T. denied them citeing that most drivers would not know why the lights were getting brighter.QUOTE]

I'd be interested to hear a little more elaboration on this...what exactly does the D.O.T. denying the taillights mean? Are manufacturers not to use the pressure sensative taillight at all, or was the company denied the patent because the D.O.T. did not see a reason why the technology should be patented? I know that BMW uses pressure sensative taillights, but rather than the entire taillight getting brighter, under regular braking the center of the brakelight lights up, and under hard braking or as brake pressure increases from regular to hard an outer brake light ring around the center illuminates. I think this would be a good technology to employ, especially with the sequential taillights. For instance, on the SN95's if the technology was used maybe under light braking the center of the three lights would illuminate, under regular braking the two inner lights would illuminate, and under hard braking all three.

We'll see what happens...


Reply With Quote
(#7 (permalink))
Old
88 Fox GT's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 1,855
Join Date: November 2002
Location: Iowa
11-12-03, 08:58 PM

I don't think pressure sensative brake lights would be a good idea. For one thing, if someone lightly stepped on the brakes and the person behind them wasn't paying much attention the lights wouldn't grab their attention very well. Brake lights are that bright to grab people attention letting them know the person in front of them is on the brakes




1988 Mustang GT 5.0
Flowmaster American Thunder Cat-back
BBK O/R H-pipe
King Cobra Clutch
BBK U/D Pullies
Drop-in K&N
3.55 Gears
Reply With Quote
(#8 (permalink))
Old
SVTdriver's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 3,425
Join Date: September 2001
Location: Seattle Wa
11-12-03, 09:00 PM

I'm not sure if it was the DOT that denied the patent. Normally it is the patent attorneys and such that determine that. But the DOT may have said that they won't approve it for street use.


Reply With Quote
(#9 (permalink))
Old
2005Eleanor's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 50
Join Date: November 2003
Location: Roswell, GA
Talking 11-12-03, 09:06 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed_Demon1965
I don't think pressure sensative brake lights would be a good idea. For one thing, if someone lightly stepped on the brakes and the person behind them wasn't paying much attention the lights wouldn't grab their attention very well. Brake lights are that bright to grab people attention letting them know the person in front of them is on the brakes
Well if they were LEDs they would be bright enough to catch someone's attention, and on the BMW the inner circle is very visible, it just has an outer ring to compliment it and show that the car is braking even harder.

And if the LED pressure sensative lights didn't work then maybe Ford could rig them to the guage lights so they would change colors with the dash board, or better yet, turn into a disco dance floor under braking...light braking: sky blue medium braking: magenta, I just saw a cop and I'm going 20 over braking: screaming yellowmedium hard braking: lime green, hard braking: syracuse orange, STOP NOW braking: bright blood red. just a thought.....


Reply With Quote
(#10 (permalink))
Old
BamaGT's Avatar
I pimped StangNet in the NY Times and all I got was this crappy title.
 
Posts: 6,145
Join Date: March 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
11-13-03, 06:21 AM

One Mustang concept car had speed-sensitive taillights--the Milano concept which became the 1971 Mustang. They were yellow while coasting, green while accelerating, and red while braking.





Brad

True Blue 2001 GT Premium Convertible
Steeda Short-Throw Shifter :: Sequential Turn Signals :: Mach 1 Grille Delete :: 14.3 @ 97.8

TheMustangSource.com
Tons of Information for All Mustang Enthusiasts

Magic City Mustangs of Birmingham
Central Alabama Chapter of the Mustang Club of America
Reply With Quote
(#11 (permalink))
Old
2005Eleanor's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 50
Join Date: November 2003
Location: Roswell, GA
11-13-03, 08:41 PM

Does anyone remember the claim about adaptive headlights? Does this mean that the headlights will follow the level of the road, as well as the turn of the road?


Reply With Quote
(#12 (permalink))
Old
GelatiCruiser's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 1,083
Join Date: June 2002
Location: 1 Mile South of Somewhere.
11-14-03, 07:05 AM

Yes. They turn with the wheel/tires, but I don't think they move up or down with the peaks and valleys of the road.




"The New York **** Sucking Football ****in' **** Me in the Ass Giants." - Artie Lang
Reply With Quote
(#13 (permalink))
Old
Member
 
Posts: 44
Join Date: August 2003
11-14-03, 11:47 AM

Strange but alot of tail lights in Europe are adaptive, maybe I am just seeing alot of BMWs. Works very well, if you see their lights get really intense you know threshold breaking is happening and you better match suit or plough thru them.

Dont know why people in the states wouldnt understand that the REALLY intense tail lights mean stop now.


Reply With Quote
(#14 (permalink))
Old
nomuffler's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 341
Join Date: August 2003
Location: Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless sex.
11-14-03, 02:39 PM

I've noticed alot of cars (Ford explorer for example) that don't light the third brake light when the brakes are pushed lightly, just add 2 more stages tho that and pow.


Reply With Quote
(#15 (permalink))
Old
ryanrule's Avatar
impotent
 
Posts: 1,446
Join Date: February 2002
Location: Madison, WI
11-14-03, 04:08 PM

no adaptive headlights, govt wont allow, no hid im guessin, cuz that would be too nice, not led tails, same reason


Reply With Quote
(#16 (permalink))
Old
SVTdriver's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 3,425
Join Date: September 2001
Location: Seattle Wa
11-14-03, 04:16 PM

I don't see LED taillights coming on a mustang for a couple more years at least. They are still prohibitivly expensive right now. But that does not mean the aftermarket won't come up with something.


Reply With Quote
(#17 (permalink))
Old
Mach172's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 381
Join Date: February 2000
Location: Albuquerque,NM
11-14-03, 07:09 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTdriver
I don't see LED taillights coming on a mustang for a couple more years at least. They are still prohibitivly expensive right now. But that does not mean the aftermarket won't come up with something.
My '04 Infiniti G35 has LED tailights, they are really cool! I didn't realize they were LED until after I bought the car!




Now: 2005 Infiniti G35 Sedan
Previous Mustangs:
2000 GT Convertible
1966 Coupe 289 (had it just 3 months, LOL!)
1968 Sprint Coupe 289
1972 Mach1 351 C
'81 Ghia Hatchback
www.knox-1.com
Reply With Quote
(#18 (permalink))
Old
drichard's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 168
Join Date: October 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
11-14-03, 07:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brokecobra
Strange but alot of tail lights in Europe are adaptive, maybe I am just seeing alot of BMWs. Works very well, if you see their lights get really intense you know threshold breaking is happening and you better match suit or plough thru them.

Dont know why people in the states wouldnt understand that the REALLY intense tail lights mean stop now.
Ya... that's stupid... the same arguments could have been used for the third break light. I think that would add to safety. May be they think people will try to get closer to see why the lights are brighter...


Reply With Quote
(#19 (permalink))
Old
drichard's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 168
Join Date: October 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
11-14-03, 07:33 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaGT
One Mustang concept car had speed-sensitive taillights--the Milano concept which became the 1971 Mustang. They were yellow while coasting, green while accelerating, and red while braking.
That's on the edge of rice though...


Reply With Quote
(#20 (permalink))
Old
2005Eleanor's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 50
Join Date: November 2003
Location: Roswell, GA
11-14-03, 08:52 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanrule
no adaptive headlights, govt wont allow, no hid im guessin, cuz that would be too nice, not led tails, same reason
The government does allow adaptive headlights (All 2004 BMWs have them. My friend's parents have a '04 330ci and a '04 745i both with adaptive headlights).

The HIDs are on the SVT Focus, so they wouldn't be "too nice" for the stang IMO...and I believe if I'm not mistaken that the newer Explorers have LED taillights...


Reply With Quote
(#21 (permalink))
Old
Founding Member
 
Posts: 128
Join Date: October 2001
Location: Everett, Washington
11-15-03, 12:08 AM

From what I remember reading in Motor Trend a couple of years ago, pressure sensitive brake lights are not street legal. However, this summer I saw a BMW motorcycle that seemed to have pressure sensitive brake lights. The idea behind them is very intuitive, the brighter they are the harder the brakes are being pressed. I am very much in favor of having pressure sensitive brake lights.

I also like the idea of LED taillights, the tend to look very good but LEDs that can handle the voltage or put out the neccesary brightness tend to be expensive, >$1 a per LED.

Having both pressure sensitive and LED brake lights is an impossiblity I believe, unless you turn on/off LEDs as the brake pressure changes, because LEDs are either on or off they can't be modulated like a conventional light bulb.

An easy way to solve the expense problem of LED tailights and HID headlights is to combine them into an options package along with things like navigation systems or special apearance packages. That way those who want a no frills basic car can have one and those that want all the coolest gadgets can have one and neither person has to settle.


Reply With Quote
(#22 (permalink))
Old
Kevin99GT's Avatar
Member
 
Posts: 25
Join Date: February 2002
Location: San Rafael, CA