Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > 94-04 V6 Mustang > V6 Talk
Reload this Page Drove an RX-8
Notices
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

This THREAD brought to you by...
(#1 (permalink))
Old
DevilishCobra03's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 266
Join Date: July 2003
Drove an RX-8 - 11-14-03, 07:50 AM

....wow


Reply With Quote
(#2 (permalink))
Old
stang2000ia's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 88
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Iowa
11-14-03, 11:05 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilishCobra03
....wow

what do you think of the rotary engine? my friends and i were talking about this once how in the rx-7's the engines seemed to give out once they got some miles on them and they werent very dependable? just wondering what your thoughts on it was.




Buying a honda is wrong, trying to mod it is a sin, saying it's fast is a crime.

Audio
2 12" Infinity Perfects
1800 Watt Farenheit Amp
2.4 Farad Power Acoustik Power Cap
4 AWG Wiring

Exterior
Cervinis Stalker Hood
GT Fog Lights

http://www.cardomain.com/id/stangv6ia
Reply With Quote
(#3 (permalink))
Old
DevilishCobra03's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 266
Join Date: July 2003
11-14-03, 11:26 AM

Well, since they are configured to run on Japanese 102 octane, that is where most of the problems came from. They are just like anything else, though. Daily driving you shouldnt see any problems, but when you go screwing with things, you better know whats going on. It was awesome to drive a car that revved like a sportbike. The dealer told me that the clutch engaged best around 2500, but whenever I hit the gas it jumped up to 3500.....I powershifted it at 8500 1-2 and the damn thing broke loose on me. Not too shabby for 238 HP. I see great things in Mazda's future. The interior finish is better than many cars almost twice the price that I have seen. And i don't think that I have to even go into handling. I was thoroughly impressed. If I hadnt heard a rumor that the 7 might be coming back I would probably buy one....great deal for 30 grand.




Naw dude, everything is a track until a cop says otherwise. ~Idiot5.0
Reply With Quote
(#4 (permalink))
Old
mustang50v8's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 374
Join Date: February 2003
Location: Dundee IL
11-14-03, 02:00 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilishCobra03
Well, since they are configured to run on Japanese 102 octane, that is where most of the problems came from. They are just like anything else, though. Daily driving you shouldnt see any problems, but when you go screwing with things, you better know whats going on. It was awesome to drive a car that revved like a sportbike. The dealer told me that the clutch engaged best around 2500, but whenever I hit the gas it jumped up to 3500.....I powershifted it at 8500 1-2 and the damn thing broke loose on me. Not too shabby for 238 HP. I see great things in Mazda's future. The interior finish is better than many cars almost twice the price that I have seen. And i don't think that I have to even go into handling. I was thoroughly impressed. If I hadnt heard a rumor that the 7 might be coming back I would probably buy one....great deal for 30 grand.
yes, but who else but mazda would solve an oil burning problem with the rx-7 by adding an extra oil tank. the only reason i know this is because some dude i used to go to school with had one and it used to burn oil like nobodys business.. and it wasnt just his...its one of the rotary engines desgin flaws. anyways i thing the front of the rx8 is ugly. it reminds me of sid the sloth from the movie ice age.


Reply With Quote
(#5 (permalink))
Old
Integraholic's Avatar
I own the place
 
Posts: 282
Join Date: July 2002
Location: Indy
11-14-03, 02:11 PM

Those are the Wankel Rotary engines. This new one is the Renesis Rotary. I dont know much about it, but It's bound to be a bit better than the old one. Now if Mazda slapped a couple turbos on, got rid of the fugly tails, I'd buy one.




~Christian
1999 Acura Integra GS-R , 14.5 seconds @ 92 mph - No longer
1986 Nissan 300ZX-T, Alive and on the streets. >=D
http://forums.stangnet.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=32422&dateline=117945  2880
Reply With Quote
(#6 (permalink))
Old
mustang50v8's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 374
Join Date: February 2003
Location: Dundee IL
11-14-03, 02:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Integraholic
Those are the Wankel Rotary engines. This new one is the Renesis Rotary. I dont know much about it, but It's bound to be a bit better than the old one. Now if Mazda slapped a couple turbos on, got rid of the fugly tails, I'd buy one.
i had no idea there was more than one type of rotary engine. i still think is ugly though


Reply With Quote
(#7 (permalink))
Old
97v6Silver's Avatar
it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5, man, they must be dumb
 
Posts: 909
Join Date: April 2003
Location: VA Beach
11-14-03, 02:28 PM

there should be a turbo rx-8




04 GMC Sierra

-97 v6 mustang **sold**
-15.168 @ 90.73 mph
-Teh Modz: JVC KD-S590 sytem, Bazooka Speakers, 35% platinum Tint, p&p upper and lower, 3:73's & t-lok, Shorty Headers, Mac CAI, UnderDrive Pullies, Mac Short Shifter, Mac O/R X, Ravins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore Trout
Damn... Seriously? Owned by 97V6silver??? Man, I am slipping. That sux. Are you sure? Damn...
Reply With Quote
(#8 (permalink))
Old
ryanrule's Avatar
impotent
 
Posts: 1,446
Join Date: February 2002
Location: Madison, WI
11-14-03, 03:45 PM

the prob with that engine without the turbo is torque, or the lack of


Reply With Quote
(#9 (permalink))
Old
BABstangV6's Avatar
Smater than the average bear!
 
Posts: 609
Join Date: April 2003
Location: Rock Hill, SC
11-14-03, 05:18 PM

i want the supra to come back




1997 Mustang GT
Reply With Quote
(#10 (permalink))
Old
aznzebra's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 77
Join Date: July 2003
Location: waterloo, ontario
11-14-03, 05:36 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BABstangV6
i want the supra to come back
i dont, because everyone else would get owned again, like in 94 when it completely caught the middle class sport category off guard. hhhaha




95 Toyota Supra Turbo 6spd
78,000km (44,000mi)
Red


99 v6 5 spd - sold
Reply With Quote
(#11 (permalink))
Old
rx7speed's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 314
Join Date: April 2003
Location: wankel wonderland
11-14-03, 10:53 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustang50v8
yes, but who else but mazda would solve an oil burning problem with the rx-7 by adding an extra oil tank. the only reason i know this is because some dude i used to go to school with had one and it used to burn oil like nobodys business.. and it wasnt just his...its one of the rotary engines desgin flaws. anyways i thing the front of the rx8 is ugly. it reminds me of sid the sloth from the movie ice age.

hehe the rotary is made to burn oil
it injects oil into the combustion chamber to lub the seals

and it doesn't need an oil tank to do it but rather it takes it straight from the sump



but it isn't a design flaw either the system works very well as long as the oil seals don't go and if they go more often then not that is owner error as to why they go


Reply With Quote
(#12 (permalink))
Old
rx7speed's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 314
Join Date: April 2003
Location: wankel wonderland
11-14-03, 11:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by stang2000ia
what do you think of the rotary engine? my friends and i were talking about this once how in the rx-7's the engines seemed to give out once they got some miles on them and they werent very dependable? just wondering what your thoughts on it was.
the motor itself is very reliable
you will see a lot of second gen N/A rx7 with 200k plus on them
mine is almost there (197k) with much abuse on it from auto-x, braket racing and my finding the open road and just letting loose through the turns
and still to this day hit above the redline when I want to work the motor and doesn't even break a sweat


and it is also a very strong motor. think I heard one time able to handle 1200hp on fully stock internals.
but many of the problems with turbo is tuning.
detonation just kills the thing. but that is tuner error not fault of the motor
also mazda tried to cut cost and wieght putting a cheap radiator in there not fit for the job ahead of it. almost maxed fuel system and some ****ty computer controls for fuel injection. all of that puts more stress on the motor then what it was designed for.
and again a lot of problems ppl come into though is they get a turbo do some mods and don't give it more fuel detonation happens motor blows and it is now the fault of the motor though when in all reality it is there fault


but oh wel


Reply With Quote
(#13 (permalink))
Old
Founding Member
 
Posts: 601
Join Date: August 2001
Location: Lancaster, PA
11-15-03, 12:35 AM

The reason there's no turbo RX-8 yet is because Mazda used high-compression rotors on it (10.0:1). Unlike with piston engines, lowering the comrpession to accommodate a turbo is not quite a straightforward process, because you have to engineer a whole new rotor (plenty of off-the-shelf parts for piston engines.. not with rotary).

The N/A FC will run damn near forever if you keep up with maintenance. The turbo models are a bit more picky and if you don't keep absolutely on top of them they can get out of hand. If rotary engines had gotten as much development effort as piston engines have over the years, then we'd see them being used a lot more widely as they are quite reliable.

The lack of low-end torque though is a major drawback to the N/A versions. But that doesn't seem to stop the ricers from getting wood over VTEC, so...




1998 Mustang - Gone.
1993 Capri XR2 - Gone.
1989 Audi 100 Quattro - Gone.
2000 Buick Regal GS - BOOST!
Reply With Quote
(#14 (permalink))
Old
Integraholic's Avatar
I own the place
 
Posts: 282
Join Date: July 2002
Location: Indy
11-15-03, 12:53 PM

Kiss my VTEC awalbert.




~Christian
1999 Acura Integra GS-R , 14.5 seconds @ 92 mph - No longer
1986 Nissan 300ZX-T, Alive and on the streets. >=D
http://forums.stangnet.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=32422&dateline=117945  2880
Reply With Quote
(#15 (permalink))
Old
Founding Member
 
Posts: 1,872
Join Date: September 2000
Location: Florence, Alabama
11-15-03, 01:52 PM

VTEC is a crutch for small displacment/no tq DAMN IT WHERE IS MY VTEC !!!!




2003 Cobra Vert - Redfire
Borla Stingers, H&R Race, MM CC Plates, MGW Shifter, JLT CAI, etc... Dyno: 400/380
Reply With Quote
(#16 (permalink))
Old
98CobraClone's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 637
Join Date: February 2003
Location: Ripley, Ohio
11-15-03, 11:29 PM

don't make no matter anyway......."my civic will be so much faster when I get the VTECH in it"

My stang will be so much faster when I get a blown 460, WTF is that

Back on subject, I've seen several older RX-7's running around here......looking like crap, but sounding good. I got to ride in a twin turbo RX-7 during an SCCA sponsored course when I was in college, they're complete and total bada$$, and mazda has been playing with the rotary engine for some time now, so they have it down pretty good now




78 Cobra (302-C4)
78 Cobra (302-4 spd)
88 GT (5.0 - 5 spd)
98 Convertible - 11 lbs. of PROCHARGER

Cast Iron GT40"P" heads for sale. UNUSED. Only used on crate engine test stand. Complete studs, rocker arms, valves, springs PM me
Reply With Quote
(#17 (permalink))
Old
rx7speed's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 314
Join Date: April 2003
Location: wankel wonderland
11-16-03, 03:13 AM

did ford try or want anything with the rotary back in the day?

I think just about every manufac tried but not sure about dodge or ford?

know GM did but they couldn't get it going right
but so did mercedes benz, rolls tried a diesel rotary, and quite a few others jumped on but nobody was really able to make a decent working version




why is it import vs ford vs chevy?
instead nice vs rice

my mazda 87 sport

RacingBeat header with 2" primary into a 2 1/2 inch collector
ported intake manifold
homemade CAI
bonez filter

I play with my wankel maybe you would like to play with my wankel as well
Reply With Quote
(#18 (permalink))
Old
ryanrule's Avatar
impotent
 
Posts: 1,446
Join Date: February 2002
Location: Madison, WI
11-16-03, 03:43 PM

ford owns mazda dont it?



Last edited by ryanrule; 11-16-03 at 03:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
(#19 (permalink))
Old
jcp123's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 497
Join Date: November 2003
Location: Tyler, TX
11-16-03, 03:59 PM

rx-8 looks like a bad 80's throwback. the lack of torque is disgusting. if they make a turbo version, then i could definitely respect that, though. and yes, ford owns some part of mazda, not sure how much...




'67 Convertible
Fully restored C-code car built in Milpitas, 306, Carter AFB 540 4-bbl, Edelbrock Performer 289 intake, original heads, stock cam, Hedman Hedders, 2" duals with 21" Cherry Bombs, C4 trans, exterior decor package, power front discs, styled steel wheels, Dark Moss Green with Ivy Gold interior, current daily driver, multiple award winner

'09 Harley Nightster
Vivid Black and Mirage Orange Pearl - gas saver!

Representing the 1% of kids that still like REAL cars: Classics
Reply With Quote
(#20 (permalink))
Old
Integraholic's Avatar
I own the place
 
Posts: 282
Join Date: July 2002
Location: Indy
11-16-03, 07:33 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcp123
JCP's Stang
-'68 Hardtop
-306 from '77 Granada
-Edelbrock 600DP, Edelbrock Perf RPM intake
-Ported heads
-Electronic HEI
-Roller rockers
-9.5 compression
-Tri-y headers, Jeg's cutouts, Dynomax RaceMagnum Bullet Muffs dumped out the side
-9" Posi (2.73's )
-2K3 Mach 1 Heritage Wheels, 245/45-WR17
-C4 Auto w/ B+M QuickSilver
Warning - Hondas will be
What ya running?


Reply With Quote
(#21 (permalink))
Old
rx7speed's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 314
Join Date: April 2003
Location: wankel wonderland
11-16-03, 09:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanrule
ford owns mazda dont it?
from the way I understand it they don't really own mazda but have quite a bit of say as to what goes on

but that doesn't mean ford tried to do anything with the rotary

I'm more or less curious if ford on their own tried something with the rotary though

so their affiliation with mazda has nothing really to do with that