| Notices |
StangNet.com is 10 years old!
Come on! Help us celebrate this fantastic feat by stopping in and letting us know how StangNet has shaped your experience surrounding the Ford Mustang! |
|
This THREAD brought to you by... |
|
|
Official Member
|
|
Posts: 59
Join Date: September 2003
Location: fenton, mi
|
|
|
Why remove the Air Silencer? -
12-04-03, 10:00 AM
Sorry for the 'newbie' question. I'm making the jump from 65-68 Mustangs to this '90...It will be a long learning period.
Thanks
|
 |
Official Member
|
|
Posts: 203
Join Date: August 2003
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
|
|
|
12-04-03, 10:21 AM
my understanding is that it functions like a mufler, and muflers restrict flow
besides its kinda funny lookin'
-Ryan
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 1,096
Join Date: January 2002
Location: Eglin AFB, Florida
|
|
|
12-04-03, 10:55 AM
The reason alot of people remove it is because it's restrictive, and quiets the intake. Removing it won't make a noticeable difference, it'll just be louder.
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 2,267
Join Date: July 2000
Location: Edmond/Norman OK
|
|
|
12-04-03, 11:03 AM
go get a soda straw and try and breathe through it. same thing as the air silencer on the engine
it really won't add a whole lot of power though. basically you won't be able to tell the difference, it will just sound louder.
Last edited by jman_b13; 12-04-03 at 11:04 AM.
|
|
Official Member
|
|
Posts: 59
Join Date: September 2003
Location: fenton, mi
|
|
|
12-04-03, 11:18 AM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jman_b13
... basically you won't be able to tell the difference, it will just sound louder.
|
So, I'll see more benefit from removing the entire Air Box and making a cold air intake or putting a K&N cone filter in it's place?
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 1,096
Join Date: January 2002
Location: Eglin AFB, Florida
|
|
|
12-04-03, 11:21 AM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 91conv
So, I'll see more benefit from removing the entire Air Box and making a cold air intake or putting a K&N cone filter in it's place?
|
Yup, pretty much.
|
 |
Official Member
|
|
Posts: 1,298
Join Date: July 2003
Location: Riverside, CA
|
|
|
12-04-03, 11:25 AM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 91conv
So, I'll see more benefit from removing the entire Air Box and making a cold air intake or putting a K&N cone filter in it's place?
|
yes for the most part u will see a better result from the custom cold air intake (cai). If u are looking for performance though, i would suggest a straightup 2.3turbo motor swap. Since u are new to this game do a few searches on "turbo" and ull see what a differnce this swap will do. 2.3 n/a =88-105(depnding on year) 2.3 turbo =175 -205 (thats stock boost...it can handle way more). Good luck, welcome to the 2.3 world do my best to answer any questions i can,and refer you to the smarter people who i know can ;o)
keep it real
-wood
|
|
Official Member
|
|
Posts: 59
Join Date: September 2003
Location: fenton, mi
|
|
|
12-04-03, 11:26 AM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by i4power
Yup, pretty much.
|
Thanks.
Which do you recomend? Cold air intake or remove box and replace with K&N?
|
|
Official Member
|
|
Posts: 59
Join Date: September 2003
Location: fenton, mi
|
|
|
12-04-03, 11:44 AM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mr_woodster
... 2.3turbo motor swap. Since u are new to this game do a few searches on "turbo" and ull see what a differnce this swap will do.
|
Thanks, I have been lurking here for awhile and understand that the turbo swap is the best bet, however, in my case, it is far down the road. I have a '65 Mustang project at this time (which gets most of my attention and fun money) So, I am looking for some small ways to get any performance boost out of this engine right now and then in a few years seriously consider the T-Swap.
It is a '90 (88-90HP), 5spd convertible. Not a '91 as my name implies. It is a fun car in great condition, that my family has had since new (was my brothers). It has 180K miles on it, so I think a rebuild or engine swap is in it's future. My wife will be driving it in nice weather, about 5K per year. If I can get a couple years out of the engine, I'll be happy.
Thanks for your help.
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 1,096
Join Date: January 2002
Location: Eglin AFB, Florida
|
|
|
12-04-03, 12:10 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 91conv
Thanks.
Which do you recomend? Cold air intake or remove box and replace with K&N?
|
Don't buy one. Build it yourself. It'll be way cheaper, and you can set it up to have a place to plug in the vacuum lines. But yeah, i'd go with a fenderwell setup.
|
 |
Official Member
|
|
Posts: 1,298
Join Date: July 2003
Location: Riverside, CA
|
|
|
12-04-03, 12:40 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 91conv
My wife will be driving it in nice weather, about 5K per year. If I can get a couple years out of the engine, I'll be happy.
Thanks for your help.
|
well depending on how well its been maintained it could last forever, mine is running 181k on the ticker, with the stock bottem end, had a new headgasket and valve cover gasket put on when i ported the head, but other than that she runs as good as new. If u keep her properly tuned up, with the 5speed, she should see way more 200k easy.
And yes, fabricate your own fenderwell intake if you decide to go that way, just buy a cone and do the piping out of whateveryou fancy. cheap and more custom of a fit IMO.
ttfn
-wood
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 1,419
Join Date: February 2002
Location: West Palm Beach
|
|
|
12-04-03, 11:52 PM
muahaha.... My 96 2.3 5-SPEED ranger, which has the EXACT same motor as the mustangs, has WELL OVER 275,000 Miles now, on the STOCK MOTOR, STOCK TRANNY, and 3 clutches !!!! It's a bit sluggish, but relaible, NO SMOKE, always starts right up, oil stays full even at my usual 10K mile oil changes (if it's lucky enough for that) and still gets pretty decent gas mileage.... Motor will last.... I beat the snot out of it....
|
 |
Founding Member
|
|
Posts: 2,009
Join Date: June 2002
Location: San Bernardino,CA USA 92405
|
|
|
12-05-03, 12:04 AM
just put in a stock replacemnt K&N filter, cut the lower half of the airbox so it can breat better, and replace the intake tubing with 2.5-3" tubing.
you get the same results, slightly better throttle response, slightly throatier, and a slight better top end. a CAI does nothing but look "cool" on a N/A 2.3 with little to lots of mods.
Last edited by silver pony; 12-05-03 at 12:06 AM.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|