Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustang > 5.0 Tech > Fox 5.0 Tuning
Reload this Page At what point do you need to consider a good tune?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

This THREAD brought to you by...
(#1 (permalink))
Old
Member
 
Posts: 35
Join Date: November 2005
Location: Boston
At what point do you need to consider a good tune? - 06-11-06, 06:47 PM

When would I, or anybody else modifying a fox body, need to consider an aftermarket tuning system? this could be a pms, tweecer or just a dyno burnt chip.




1990 GT - 25th anniv.
Fresh 302, Edelbrock Performer heads, C&L MAF, 70mm TB, TFS track heat intake, TFS stage 1 cam, AFPR, 24lb injectors, CAI, FMS roller rockers, BBK longtubes, offroad h-pipe, edelbrock cat-back, rebuilt t-5, spec clutch, steeda triax, 3.73 rear, subframe connectors
Reply With Quote
(#2 (permalink))
Old
Official Member
 
Posts: 740
Join Date: September 2003
Location: Kennesaw, GA
06-11-06, 10:38 PM

Simple answer would be whenever you begin to experience driveability problems or whenever you want to get more power out of your present setup.

Some would say that after any change to intake or exhaust (whether it be CAI, new MAF, turbos, supercharger, nitrous, throttle body, intake, heads...headers, x/h pipe, mufflers) you should get your ride tuned/tune it yourself.

I waited until I had done some decent work and wanted to get some more power...plus I noticed some fuel issues at high RPM's when at the track...that is when I bought my PMS.

I am sure someone will have a more precise answer for you, but I am guessing it is a matter of personal opinion for the most part...and how fat your wallet is since none of the tuners or a chip burning dyno session are cheap.




----
Criticman.com
Supercharged '93 LX 5.0 Hatch (SOLD, 8/03-3/07)
'99 BMW M3 Coupe
Reply With Quote
(#3 (permalink))
Old
vristang's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 4,201
Join Date: March 2005
Location: Seattle
06-11-06, 11:13 PM

I would suggest it when running more than a .060 bore displacement increase, or an aftermarket (70mm or bigger) MAF.

Both of these things can cause some issues.

However, it may be that the adaptive ability of the EEC will be able to compensate for these changes, so who knows?

I am not sure how to decide when a tuner is required, but that is my take on it.

jason




Reply With Quote
(#4 (permalink))
Old
N8Miller's Avatar
I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
 
Posts: 2,686
Join Date: July 2000
Location: Kingston, PA, USA
06-13-06, 06:35 PM

Alot of it depends on if you FEEL you need one. criticman brought up a good point... when you experience any driveability issues, etc etc.
my opinion: you should definately have one with a power adder, or if you plan on making some good power (350+) and not having it dyno tuned. for 90% of people with a HCI setup, a dyno tune would be best. but for the other 10% that must always do it theirself, or maybe possibly changing the setup later, a personal tuner is the way to go.




1986 GT:331, Edelbrock Vic Jr heads, Jay Allen custom cam, TFS R intake, 30# injectors, 75mm t-body, 80mm PRO-M, AFM Powerpipe, BBK 1 3/4 long tubes, BBK X pipe, 4.10s, 5 lug conversion, 99GT rims/Nitto DRs, PBR brakes, Lakewood 50/50s, Moroso rear drag springs, Sub frames, 2.5" cowl, Saleen spoiler
Power of a low 11 second car, Traction of a high 14 second car!




Reply With Quote
(#5 (permalink))
Old
Official Member
 
Posts: 740
Join Date: September 2003
Location: Kennesaw, GA
06-14-06, 07:19 PM

Yeah. I agree. If you are doing HCI and you don't plan on anything else (or at least not for a good while), a dyno tune is your best bet.

On the other hand, I knew I would be doing a new intake/TB, was already having top end issues, and also knew I would be going with some sort of boost maker, so I decided a handheld tuner was ideal for my situation.




----
Criticman.com
Supercharged '93 LX 5.0 Hatch (SOLD, 8/03-3/07)
'99 BMW M3 Coupe
Reply With Quote
(#6 (permalink))
Old
91ghp5.0's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 197
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida
07-16-06, 02:54 PM

so for an HCI, it really isnt all that necessary for a chip? what do you guys consider a dyno tune? but with nitrous, it would be necessary? a dyno tune wouldnt be enough?




1991 Georgia Highway Patrol Car (Coupe)
Suspension, bolt ons, and a cam.
WTB: Paxton Novi 1000 or Vortech SC-trim.

http://www.cardomain.com/id/91ghp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland69
I pitty the fool who don't got a MGW
Reply With Quote
(#7 (permalink))
Old
LEE93COBRA's Avatar
GoldMember
 
Posts: 1,938
Join Date: April 2000
Location: Alabama
07-18-06, 08:02 PM

I am curious to know what you guys are referring to a "dyno tune" that doesn't include some type of EEC tuner/chip. You are not tuning anything unless you make changes in a chip.

My opinion is do it with a H/C/I and when running a aftermarket MAF. I would also do it when upgrading injectors since you sometimes see driviability issues.

Real tuning involves MAF transfer curve changes, timing table adjustments, and fuel table changes to name a few.
The MAF can be a big issue when running aftermarket MAFS. Trust me.
If this is an area you want to learn ( DIY EEc tuning) I suggest go ahead and get what you plan to use and start learning while your car is still mostly stock. There is a ton of info to learn.
You can go to my forums and look around in the EEC room to see some of the topics we discuss. While most of my members that post in there are Tweecer users, it is not just applicable to that type of EEC editor




www.streetstangs.net

93 Cobra.....sold
01 Cobra vert....wife's
84 SVO........new project car
03 F250
08 GT
Reply With Quote
(#8 (permalink))
Old
vristang's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 4,201
Join Date: March 2005
Location: Seattle
07-18-06, 08:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by LEE93COBRA
I am curious to know what you guys are referring to a "dyno tune" that doesn't include some type of EEC tuner/chip. You are not tuning anything unless you make changes in a chip.
I think it is assumed that a dyno tune involves burning a custom chip. You are right to point that out for clarification though.


To add to my previous response...
I wish I had picked up a tuner much sooner. When I installed the 351w should have been the latest I started doing my own tunes.
I never had any drivability issues with just a cobra intake, maf, and 24s on the stock A9L though.




Reply With Quote
(#9 (permalink))
Old
LEE93COBRA's Avatar
GoldMember
 
Posts: 1,938
Join Date: April 2000
Location: Alabama
07-18-06, 08:35 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by vristang
I think it is assumed that a dyno tune involves burning a custom chip. You are right to point that out for clarification though.


:
I just wanted to make sure. Some of the other posts made it sound like a dyno tune was something other than a EEC modification.




www.streetstangs.net

93 Cobra.....sold
01 Cobra vert....wife's
84 SVO........new project car
03 F250
08 GT
Reply With Quote
(#10 (permalink))
Old
91ghp5.0's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 197
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida
07-18-06, 09:50 PM

lee...what kind of tuning is required with a nitrous shot?




1991 Georgia Highway Patrol Car (Coupe)
Suspension, bolt ons, and a cam.
WTB: Paxton Novi 1000 or Vortech SC-trim.

http://www.cardomain.com/id/91ghp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland69
I pitty the fool who don't got a MGW
Reply With Quote
(#11 (permalink))
Old
LEE93COBRA's Avatar
GoldMember
 
Posts: 1,938
Join Date: April 2000
Location: Alabama
07-19-06, 05:01 AM

On my car I removed timing on the WOT tables and added a little fuel at different rpm spots in the WOT fuel table. The fuel changes were made based off what the w/b on the dyno showed




www.streetstangs.net

93 Cobra.....sold
01 Cobra vert....wife's
84 SVO........new project car
03 F250
08 GT
Reply With Quote
(#12 (permalink))
Old
91ghp5.0's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 197
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida
07-19-06, 09:45 PM

will a chip/anderson PMS be needed?




1991 Georgia Highway Patrol Car (Coupe)
Suspension, bolt ons, and a cam.
WTB: Paxton Novi 1000 or Vortech SC-trim.

http://www.cardomain.com/id/91ghp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland69
I pitty the fool who don't got a MGW
Reply With Quote
(#13 (permalink))
Old
LEE93COBRA's Avatar
GoldMember
 
Posts: 1,938
Join Date: April 2000
Location: Alabama
07-20-06, 05:06 AM

For what combo?




www.streetstangs.net

93 Cobra.....sold
01 Cobra vert....wife's
84 SVO........new project car
03 F250
08 GT
Reply With Quote
(#14 (permalink))
Old
VG30DE's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Posts: 442
Join Date: September 2002
Location: Dudley, MA
07-20-06, 09:22 AM

I dont have a chip, tuner, btm, or anything. Drives like stock, better on gas than stock, runs excellent, no surges or flat spots, reliable as hell. It all depends on how lucky you are, whether or not you need a tune/tuner. Sure, I'd have a cleaner looking A/F curve with a tune but you know what, it drives fine and runs 10s and drives home. I would say I dont need a tune. If it popped, bucked and spuddered home with a huge flat spot in midrange rpm's (just examples of when you need a "tune"), than I would do something about it. Thats really the basis of whether or not you need to change the tune.




1993 LX 5.0 T5 Notch - Twin Turbo -
(2) T04B's, (2) Tial 38mm gates, Vecco FMIC, Hallman Pro MBC, Greddy Type S BOV
Stock shortblock, E7 heads, Comp cam, GT40 intake, 42# injectors
531 RWHP, 557 RWTQ @ 16 psi
217 quarter mile runs and counting

2003 WRX (its blue obviously)
231 AWHP, 229 AWTQ @ 17 psi
Reply With Quote
(#15 (permalink))
Old
QDRHRSE's Avatar
Official Member
 
Posts: 1,602
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Palmdale, CA
07-22-06, 09:07 AM

I think a lot of people have the wrong idea about custom tunes. Most of you guys have addressed the best reason- drivability. Alot of people think they are going to pick up 30-40hp with a tune and if a car is already running properly that's not going to happen. A really hard running car could actually lose hp on the dyno for the sake of a flatter tq curve and better drivability.

As far as performance goes, with the right gauges you should be able tune for ET @ the racetrack better than on the dyno. With a vacuum/boost gauge, wideband, and fp gauges you can do alot. Fox bodies are really simple and the motors are very forgiving.




1989 Saleen #052. GT40 Crate Motor,TKO 600, and a lot of other expensive junk. Garage Queen Extraordinare.
Reply With Quote
(#16 (permalink))
Old
Founding Member
 
Posts: 596
Join Date: January 2002
Location: NJ
02-23-07, 10:13 PM

guess its just me but i come from the school of a car doesnt need to be modded at all to get tuned...ive seen bone stock cars pick up power on the rollers from just tuning, ive seen bone stock cars act and drive better just from tuning...i think some logging/tuning software should be one of the first buys
just me




Eric
AIM: Shortyd43
93 TA
LT1/M6/Clean title
Confirmed 13 second car
Buy Me!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Cold air kit (no tune required) afixer 2005+ V6 Tech 49 08-05-05 10:47 AM
diablo predator (what tune to use?) laserred 4.6 Tech 7 11-23-04 06:42 AM
Dyno Tune Or Plenum & TB TweekedGT 4.6 Tech 2 10-14-04 09:20 AM
91 octane Predator tune good for octane emergencies... jordanvraptor SVT Tech 1 06-20-04 05:36 AM
Modified Predator Tune Installed STL00GT 4.6 Tech 2 06-10-04 10:05 AM